EnigmA Amiga Run 1997 July/EnigmA AMIGA RUN 20 (1997)(G.R. Edizioni)(IT)[!][issue 1997-07 & 08][EAR-CD IV].iso/lightwave/tml/95.toaster-05/[e-mail]_Tue May 30 18:44:37 1995.msg

Internet Message Format | 1995-06-03 | 2KB

Received: by webcom.com
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA018674677; Tue, 30 May 1995 18:44:37 -0700
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from ix4.ix.netcom.com by webcom.com with ESMTP
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA018544673; Tue, 30 May 1995 18:44:33 -0700
Received: from  by ix4.ix.netcom.com (8.6.12/SMI-4.1/Netcom)
    id SAA26159; Tue, 30 May 1995 18:46:52 -0700
Date: Tue, 30 May 1995 18:46:52 -0700
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
From: [e-mail] (Thierry Humeau )
Subject: Re: How is the Flyer?
To: [e-mail] (Joel Erickson)
Cc: [e-mail]
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk

You wrote:
>
>> I don't quite understand your point here. No it "doesn't slow down" and
>> A/B roll edits are perfects.  There are still a few sequencing problems
>> that are being addressed and will be fixed in the next software update.
>
>Right on... What I was asking was, say, if you have footage with huge
>moving objects, if you miss frames or get really low quality frames,
>like you do with the PAR?
>

No, you don't see this kind of problem especially with the new HQ-5 video quality.
Fast moving object are not a problem for VTASC, however, wide areas with very fine
detail like a brick wall used to be a problem when digitizing using the "standard"
quality.

Thierry.
--
*******************************************************
Thierry Humeau             tel: [phone]
Cameraman/Producer        fax: [phone]
Freelance/TV Networks            [e-mail]
*******************************************************

--
[e-mail] (Thierry Humeau ) posted this message.
To Post a message            : [e-mail]
For Un/Subscription requests : [e-mail]
(DIGEST)                  OR : [e-mail]
Administrative Messages      : [e-mail]